it’s a wrong idea.

refer to the previous article..

https://donation.science.blog/2022/12/11/a-redundant-mathematical-concept/

the infinite infinities concept in mathematics isn’t just redundant but also wrong. to take even the minimum amount of symbols — 0 and 1 or A and B — the full number of different lists is always larger than the length of the list, thus taking any diagonal and flipping the symbols will not represent a new and different list of symbols.

for example the matrix: AAA / AAB / ABA / ABB / BAA / BAB / BBA / BBB , can only have diagonals of three symbols and no matter which diagonal you take and flip the symbols the list of the same symbols already exists.

also the larger and smaller infinities don’t make sense because then you must invent the concept of passing time to counting the infinities, in sense that which number of infinities grows faster than the other. but in that case the exponentials, the exponentials of exponentials etc are each even larger infinites than current concepts of larger infinities. that is a nonsense — infinity is always infinity. you cannot apply the reasoning taken from finite numbers to the idea of infinity — it just doesn’t work that way messing up the entire principle of the infinity meaning a never ending phenomenon. one infinity cannot be larger than another. they all will never end.

_

By:

Posted in:


Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started